Business readiness for the agent era

Your next movewith agents.Made clear.

Know where agents can deliver value, what needs to change, and what to do first.

Explore the four views See the decision brief

For CIOs, CTOs and the teams making it happen.

Your business, connected Four perspectives
Code Team Web Product
Four perspectives. One clear next move.Select to explore ↗
01

Business priorities first.

02

Evidence behind every recommendation.

03

Clear about what remains unproven.

01 / The whole picture

One business.
Four ways to be ready.

Your teams use agents. Your customers bring theirs. Assess both sides, with a clear decision for each.

CodeYour foundations TeamYour ways of working WebYour discoverability ProductYour customer journeys

01 / Code readiness

Can agents change your software safely?

Identify where the repository supports reliable agent work and where missing context, fragile tests or tangled dependencies stand in the way.

  • Context & documentation
  • Change safety
  • Bounded task trials

An example question to test

Can an agent fix a bug without creating another one?

Reproduce the environment and the failure.
Make a bounded change and verify the outcome.
Record regressions and human intervention.
The decision: which repositories and task types to pilot first.View the existing repository report ↗

02 / Team readiness · Proposed

Are your teams turning access into better work?

Review permissioned coding-agent sessions alongside the changes they produced. Find better ways to frame tasks, supply context and verify results.

  • Task framing
  • Delegation & review
  • Verified outcomes

An example question to test

What would make the next agent-assisted task better?

Look for clear scope and acceptance criteria.
Separate workflow friction from tool limitations.
Connect the session to review, tests and rework.
The decision: where coaching or workflow changes can help.Coaching for teams. No activity leaderboard.

03 / Web readiness · Proposed

Can agents find and understand your business?

Test whether an agent can access your public information and accurately understand your offering, pricing and policies.

  • Discoverability
  • Content access
  • Information accuracy

An example question to test

Can an agent explain the right plan to a prospective buyer?

Locate the relevant product and pricing details.
Read eligibility, limitations and policy terms.
Check the answer against authoritative content.
The decision: which information barriers to remove first.Access is testable. Recommendations are not guaranteed.

04 / Product readiness · Proposed

Can agents get things done in your product?

Test real customer journeys through your interface, APIs or MCP. Check the completed outcome, permissions and recovery when something fails.

  • Journey completion
  • APIs & MCP
  • Permissions & recovery

An example question to test

Can an agent change a booking with the right approval?

Find the correct booking within authorised access.
Confirm the change and handle retries safely.
Verify the booking changed, not just the message.
The decision: which journeys can support an agent pilot.An integration is a starting point, not proof of readiness.
Choose the assessment that serves your decision. Expand when the evidence calls for it.Code assessment exists. Team, Web and Product are the proposed expansion.

02 / Built for the decision-maker

Less dashboard.
More direction.

A leadership brief that connects technical findings to the decisions you need to make.

  • Where to start, and where to hold
  • The evidence and its limits
  • Priority actions and accountable owners
  • What to verify at the next checkpoint
Explore today's repository report
Leadership decision brief / Illustrative

Your next three moves.

An example of the direction an assessment should provide.

01Start

A supervised coding pilot.

Begin with bounded maintenance tasks in the best-supported repository. Keep human approval on every change.

OWNER / ENGINEERING · GATE / VERIFIED TASK OUTCOMES
02Fix

The friction in a critical journey.

Close permission and retry gaps in the booking flow before opening it to customer agents.

OWNER / PRODUCT + PLATFORM · GATE / JOURNEY RETEST
03Prove

Whether the investment is paying off.

Compare accepted task outcomes, review effort and rework against a baseline. Usage alone is not the result.

OWNER / ENGINEERING LEAD · GATE / BASELINE COMPARISON
Specific use cases. Explicit limits. No blanket autonomy claim.01 / 01

03 / Confidence you can inspect

A clear line between
evidence and assumption.

Readiness depends on the task, the tools and the environment. Every assessment should make those boundaries visible.

01 / OBSERVED

What is there.

Inspectable evidence from the agreed scope: documentation, configuration, interfaces and working practices.

A test suite exists. Its quality still needs checking.

02 / TESTED

What actually works.

Approved tasks with explicit success criteria. Record the conditions, outcomes and human intervention.

A specific task passed under stated conditions.

03 / UNKNOWN

What is still unproven.

Missing access, untested journeys and evidence gaps remain visible. They become the next questions to resolve.

Production reliability has not been established.

No single score declares an entire business agent-ready. Decisions stay tied to evidence and use cases.Why task outcomes matter ↗

04 / A practical first step

Start with one
important decision.

Pick a business priority. Define the scope and evidence needed. Leave with a clear next move and a way to check progress.

Explore the code assessment pilot
01

Scope the question.

One business priority, named systems and agreed access.

02

Establish the evidence.

Inspect the foundations. Agree which tasks to test.

03

Make the next move.

Prioritised actions, owners and a measurable checkpoint.

Built in stages.
Clear from day one.

Start with the code assessment.Explore the existing repository offering. Repository health and change safety can also be scoped independently.

The broader platform is the vision.Team, Web and Product are proposed modules. Knowledge, controls and value measurement are future extensions, not live capabilities.

Your starting point

One decision.
A useful first brief.

Create a short scoping document to share with your leadership team or assessment partner. This does not book an assessment.

Which perspectives matter?

Created entirely in your browser. Nothing is sent, saved to this site or submitted to a sales team. Team, Web and Product are proposed assessments.